Ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Factors Affecting Participation in Telerehabilitation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Patients with Poststroke Paralysis in South Korea.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has expanded noncontact health care systems worldwide. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technology that enables treatment monitoring under remote supervision. We investigated the factors affecting patients' decision to participate in telerehabilitation (TR) using tDCS for motor function recovery after suffering a stroke. Materials and Methods: Four medical institutions surveyed 156 patients with poststroke paralysis. The participants were asked whether they would participate in TR therapy using tDCS in the future. We performed logistic regression analysis to examine the factors-demographic data, stroke characteristics, arm function, gait, and cognitive function-that influenced participants' decisions. Results: Of the participants, 66% (103/156) reported that they would participate in TR using tDCS in the future. Participants' monthly salary was a single significant independent factor influencing their decision to participate. Those earning greater than 5 million KRW (4,000 USD) were more likely to engage in TR via tDCS than those earning less than 1 million KRW (800 USD). The most common barriers to participation in telemedicine included the preference for face-to-face treatment and unfamiliarity. The expected medical expenses of TR using tDCS were 46,154 KRW (37 USD) per session. Conclusions: Most participants with poststroke paralysis responded positively to TR using tDCS for hand function recovery. For telemedicine to work effectively in a situation wherein face-to-face rehabilitation is impossible, prior discussion at the governmental level is essential for determining medical finances.

Third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for patients with multiple myeloma.

We have reported that IgG antibody responses following two mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations are impaired among patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In the current study, sixty-seven patients with MM were tested for anti-spike IgG antibodies 0-60 days prior to their first vaccination, 14-28 days following the second dose, and both before and 14-28 days after their third dose of the mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines. After the first two doses, most patients' (93 %) antibody levels declined to ineffective levels (<250 BAU/mL) prior to their third dose (D3). D3 elicited responses in 84 % of patients (61 % full response and 22 % partial response). The third vaccination increased antibody levels (average = 370.4 BAU/mL; range, 1.0-8977.3 BAU/mL) relative to just prior to D3 (average = 25.0 BAU/mL; range, 1.0-683.8 BAU/mL) and achieved higher levels than peak levels after the first two doses (average = 144.8 BAU/mL; range, 1.0-4,284.1 BAU/mL). D3 response positively correlated with mRNA-1273, a > 10-fold change from baseline for the two-dose series, switching from BNT162b2 to mRNA-1273 for D3, and treatment with elotuzumab and an immunomodulatory agent. Lower antibody levels prior to D3, poorer overall response to first two doses, and ruxolitinib or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody treatment negatively correlated with D3 response. Our results show encouraging activity of the third vaccine, even among patients who failed to respond to the first two vaccinations. The finding of specific factors that predict COVID-19 antibody levels will help advise patients and healthcare professionals on the likelihood of responses to further vaccinations.